↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology and impact of HIV coinfection with Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C viruses in Sub-Saharan Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Virology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiology and impact of HIV coinfection with Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C viruses in Sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
Journal of Clinical Virology, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.05.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippa C. Matthews, Anna Maria Geretti, Philip J.R. Goulder, Paul Klenerman

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) are blood-borne viruses with potentially shared routes of transmission. In high-income settings, the impact of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on survival has unmasked chronic liver disease from viral hepatitis B or hepatitis C as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with HIV infection. It is now feared that progressive liver disease may threaten the success of ART programmes in developing countries, where HCV or HBV testing and monitoring are not yet systematic among HIV-infected patients and ART use is generally blind to these co-infections. We set out to review recent data from Sub-Saharan Africa, in order to build a detailed and up-to-date picture of the epidemiology and emerging impact of HBV and HCV coinfection in countries at the heart of the HIV pandemic. There is a preponderance of HIV/HBV coinfection compared to HIV/HCV in this region, and significant caveats exist regarding the accuracy of published HCV seroprevalence surveys. Morbidity and mortality of coinfection is significant, and may be further enhanced in African populations due to the influence of host, viral and environmental factors. Careful scrutiny of the coinfection problem is vital to inform an approach to directing resources, planning public health initiatives, providing clinical care, and guiding future research.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 238 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 20%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 63 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,734,654
of 24,468,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Virology
#654
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,142
of 242,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Virology
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,468,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.